Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/125337 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2014
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] IZA World of Labor [ISSN:] 2054-9571 [Article No.:] 110 [Publisher:] Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) [Place:] Bonn [Year:] 2014
Verlag: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Randomized control trials (RCTs) have become increasingly important as an evidence-based method to evaluate interventions such as government programs and policy initiatives. Frequently, however, RCTs are characterized by "imperfect compliance," in that not all the subjects who are randomly assigned to take a treatment choose to do so. This could result in a failure to identify the treatment effect, or the impact of the treatment on the population. However, useful information on treatment effectiveness can still be recovered by estimating "bounds," or a range of values in which treatment effectiveness can lie.
Schlagwörter: 
experiments
field experiments
treatment effects
bound analysis
JEL: 
C83
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.34 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.