Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/20111 
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 862
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
This paper offers a critical evaluation of the notion of collective voice, advanced by Freeman and Medoff (1984) in their pioneering contribution What Do Unions Do? It takes note of theoretical and empirical work supportive of/consistent with the collective voice/institutional response model, and tracks some development of the model. Equally, although much criticism of What Do Unions Do? has been wide of the mark, there are critical areas in which the model is deficient. These lacunae include, but are not restricted to, the lingering imprecision of collective voice; the problem of bargaining power which calls into question the distinction between collective voice/institutional response and the monopoly face of unionism; the over-emphasis upon worker dissatisfaction; and, relatedly, the neglect of individual voice. The bottom line is that the notion of union voice is urgently in need of restatement if it is to continue to shape research into the economic consequences of unions.
Subjects: 
unions
collective/individual voice
institutional response
public goods
contract enforcement
high performance work practices
JEL: 
J51
J53
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
338.29 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.