Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/24105 
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
ZEW Discussion Papers No. 05-12
Publisher: 
Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim
Abstract: 
In Germany, the medium-term financial planning ("Mifrifi") was introduced at the end of the sixties. This study scrutinizes the experience of the German Bund with more than thirty years of financial planning. In the first step, the paper explores the potential normative and political-economic driving forces of fiscal projections. The following empirical part evaluates Mifrifi?s forecasting quality with regard to expenditures, taxes and deficits. A model is tested relating the forecasted budgetary trends to economic, institutional and political-economic factors. The financial planning turns out to be ineffective in making budgetary policy more predictable. The projections are heavily biased towards over-optimism. The Maastricht Treaty appears to have transformed Germany?s budgetary planning not into the direction of more credible and binding projections, but rather towards the production of less realistic and unduly favourable outlooks. The policy conclusion hints towards an independent institution taking over the responsibility for fiscal forecasts. Such an institution would not face the government?s inherent problem being unable to promise in a credible way the production of unbiased forecasts.
Subjects: 
Mifrifi
budgetary planning
Stability and Growth Pact
JEL: 
H87
H61
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
242.46 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.