Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/35205 
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 3512
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
In democratic societies individual attitudes of voters represent the foundations of policy making. We start by analyzing patterns in public opinion on migration and find that, across countries of different income levels, only a small minority of voters favour more open migration policies. Next we investigate the determinants of voters' preferences towards immigration from a theoretical and empirical point of view. Our analysis supports the role played by economic channels (labour market, welfare state, efficiency gains) using both the 1995 and 2003 rounds of the ISSP survey. The second part of the paper examines how attitudes translate into a migration policy outcome. We consider two alternative political-economy frameworks: the median voter and the interest groups model. On the one hand, the restrictive policies in place across destination countries and the very low fractions of voters favouring immigration are consistent with the median voter framework. At the same time, given the extent of individual-level opposition to immigration that appears in the data, it is somewhat puzzling, in a median-voter perspective, that migration flows take place at all. Interest-groups dynamics have the potential to explain this puzzle. We find evidence from regression analysis supporting both political-economy frameworks.
Subjects: 
Immigration
immigration policy
median voter
interest groups
political economy
JEL: 
F22
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
297.87 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.