Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/175233 
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 796
Publisher: 
Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance, London
Abstract: 
A well-known theoretical result in the contest literature is that greater heterogeneity decreases performance of contestants because of the "discouragement effect." Leveling the playing field by favoring weaker contestants through bid-caps and favorable tie-breaking rules can reduce the discouragement effect and increase the designer's revenue. We test these predictions in an experiment. Our data show that indeed, strengthening weaker contestants through tie-breaks and bid-caps significantly diminishes the discouragement effect. Bid-caps can also improve revenue. Most deviations from Nash equilibrium can be explained by the level-k model of reasoning.
Subjects: 
All-pay auction
Rent-seeking
Bid-caps
Tie-breaks
Contest design
JEL: 
C72
C91
D72
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
508.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.