Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/192298 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2002
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Papers No. 316
Verlag: 
Statistics Norway, Research Department, Oslo
Zusammenfassung: 
Do households' recycling efforts represent a social cost, which should be taken into account in cost-benefit analyses of alternative waste treatment systems? Some argue that it should not, since recycling efforts are to a large extent voluntary. We demonstrate that if the government can indirectly increase voluntary recycling efforts through appeals to the public or through similar means, then the use of these means does impose a cost on households. This cost can be higher or lower than the environmental gain resulting from the increased recycling. Norwegian data indicates a willingness to pay to let others take over the individual's sorting of household waste corresponding to a cost of about USD 87 per tonne, which is significant compared to the total treatment costs.
Schlagwörter: 
Cost-benefit analysis
norms
recycling
time use
JEL: 
D11
D12
D61
D69
Q38
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
131.21 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.