Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/197762 
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 745
Publisher: 
University of California, Economics Department, Santa Cruz, CA
Abstract: 
The global movement against corruption has long assumed its demise lay in transparency and accountability. We test this assumption by measuring whether highly accountable Indian village council presidents favor their own households while making observable allocations of public works jobs. We link millions of public works records to election outcomes. We find that winners of close elections receive 3 times as many days of labor as losers, earning excess wages equaling two-thirds of the median president's salary. Using an original survey of council presidents we find suggestive evidence that corruption is "performance pay" used to attract talented candidates into office.
JEL: 
D72
D73
H53
H75
I38
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
786.44 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.