Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/202736 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2019
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 12390
Verlag: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
Approaches to measuring health inequalities are often problematic in that they use methods that are inappropriate for categorical data. The approach here focuses on "pure" or univariate health inequality (rather than income-related or bivariate health inequality) and is based on a concept of individual status that allows a consistent treatment of such data. We use several versions of the status concept and apply methods for treating categorical data to examine self-assessed health inequality for the countries contained in the World Health Survey; we also use regression analysis on the apparent determinants of these health inequality estimates. Our findings indicate major differences in health-inequality rankings depending on the status concept. We find evidence that health inequalities vary with median health status alongside indicators of institutional performance.
Schlagwörter: 
health inequality
categorical data
entropy measures
health surveys
upward status
downward status
JEL: 
D63
H23
I18
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
598.21 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.