Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/209264 
Year of Publication: 
2015
Citation: 
[Editor:] Kersten, Wolfgang [Editor:] Blecker, Thorsten [Editor:] Ringle, Christian M. [Editor:] 978-3-7375-4059-9 [Title:] Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 20 [Publisher:] epubli GmbH [Place:] Berlin [Year:] 2015 [Pages:] 419-450
Publisher: 
epubli GmbH, Berlin
Abstract: 
Supply chains have become more vulnerable because of increased globalization and interdependency between network actors and risks. It is, therefore, extremely important to model interdependency between risks taking into account the supply network configuration. In this paper, we have followed the existing concept of modelling supply network as a Bayesian belief network capturing network configuration, probabilistic interdependency between risks and losses resulting from the realization of risks. We propose a new method for evaluating efficacy of different combinations of redundancy strategies. For each node of the network, we incorporated a strategy of adding redundant resource as a risk management approach that would disengage the particular node from its parent node(s). The model was solved against the bicriteria objective of maximizing normalized expected utility for loss exposure and normalized utility for cost of redundancy strategies keeping into account different risk attitudes and criteria weights. The model also helped in identifying optimal combination of strategies for specific allocation of budget as there could be different combinations of allocating redundant resources across the network resulting in supoptimal values of risk measures.
Subjects: 
Supply Network Configuration
Bayesian Belief Network
Redundancy Strategies
Risk Attitudes
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-sa Logo
Document Type: 
Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.