Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/215391 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 12995
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
While vocational education is meant to provide occupational-specific skills that are directly employable, their returns may be limited in fast-changing economies. Conversely, general education should provide learning skills, but these may have little value at low levels of education. This paper sheds light on this debate by exploiting a recent Spanish reform that postpones students' choice between these two educational pathways from age 14 to 16. To identify exogenous changes in its staggered implementation, we instrument this with the pre-reform across-province variation in the share of students in general education. Results indicate that, by shifting educational investment from vocational to general education after age 16, the reform improves occupational outcomes, and results in a significant rise in monthly wages. The effects are larger after the financial crisis, but are concentrated among middle to high-skilled individuals. In contrast, those who acquire only basic general education have worse long-term employment prospects than vocationally-trained individuals.
Subjects: 
general versus vocational education
heterogeneous returns
financial crisis
JEL: 
I26
I28
J24
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
2.25 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.