Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/234917 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2020
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
ISER Discussion Paper No. 1105
Verlag: 
Osaka University, Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER), Osaka
Zusammenfassung: 
We develop a simple spatial equilibrium model with the peer group effect and local public finance to analyze the implications of housing policies such as public housing and housing voucher programs, and education policies such as school finance consolidation. The calibrated model can match several stylized facts of the labor market and the housing market in the United States. Our counterfactual policy analyses suggest that public housing and housing voucher programs have similar welfare implications on the household level. However, within a household, the public housing program tends to benefit the children more than the parents, while the housing voucher program delivers the opposite result. Combining the school finance consolidation policy with the public housing program could improve the well-being of children from poor households without hurting other households' welfare. Some policies' short-run welfare implications can deviate significantly from their long-run counterparts when all choices are optimized.
Schlagwörter: 
school finance consolidation
public housing
housing voucher
endogenous sorting mechanism
short-run rigidity versus long-run flexibility
JEL: 
H00
I20
R00
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
760.17 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.