Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/240323 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] European Union Politics [ISSN:] 1741-2757 [Volume:] 22 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Sage [Place:] Thousand Oaks [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 353-376
Verlag: 
Sage, Thousand Oaks
Zusammenfassung: 
The protection of asylum seekers and refugees has become one of the most politically divisive issues in the European Union, yet there has been a lack of research on public preferences for asylum and refugee policies. This article analyzes which policies Europeans prefer and why. We advance a theoretical framework that explains how asylum and refugee policies that use limits and conditions enable individuals to resolve conflicting humanitarian and perceived national interest logics. Using an original conjoint experiment in eight countries, we demonstrate that Europeans prefer policies that provide refugee protection but also impose control through limits or conditions. In contrast to the divisive political debates between European Union member states, we find consistent public preferences across European countries.
Schlagwörter: 
asylum and refugee policy
Europe
migration
policy preferences
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.