Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/241908 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
cemmap working paper No. CWP33/20
Publisher: 
Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice (cemmap), London
Abstract: 
Uncertainty about the choice of identifying assumptions is common in causal studies, but is often ignored in empirical practice. This paper considers uncertainty over models that impose different identifying assumptions, which, in general, leads to a mix of point- and set-identified models. We propose performing inference in the presence of such uncertainty by generalizing Bayesian model averaging. The method considers multiple posteriors for the set-identified models and combines them with a single posterior for models that are either point-identified or that impose non-dogmatic assumptions. The output is a set of posteriors (post-averaging ambiguous belief ) that are mixtures of the single posterior and any element of the class of multiple posteriors, with weights equal to the posterior model probabilities. We suggest reporting the set of posterior means and the associated credible region in practice, and provide a simple algorithm to compute them. We establish that the prior model probabilities are updated when the models are "distinguishable" and/or they specify different priors for reduced-form parameters, and characterize the asymptotic behavior of the posterior model probabilities. The method provides a formal framework for conducting sensitivity analysis of empirical findings to the choice of identifying assumptions. In a standard monetary model, for example, we show that, in order to support a negative response of output to a contractionary monetary policy shock, one would need to attach a prior probability greater than 0.05 to the validity of the assumption that prices do not react contemporaneously to the shock.
Subjects: 
Partial Identification
Sensitivity Analysis
Model Averaging
Bayesian Robustness
Ambiguity
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
650.76 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.