Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/248806 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2020
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Documento de Trabajo No. 06/2020
Verlag: 
Universidad Católica Boliviana, Instituto de Investigaciones Socio-Económicas (IISEC), La Paz
Zusammenfassung: 
Natural resources are often related to conflicts. The Dal B'o & Dal B'o (2011) theory states that income shocks affect capital- and labor-intensive sectors differently. Using sub-national cells covering the African continent for 1997-2010, I find that conflicts react differently to positive commodity price shocks depending on their factor intensity. The results show that a positive shock in the capital-intensive mining sector increases conflict likelihood, whereas a positive shock in the labor-intensive agricultural sector reduces it. These impacts are higher for sub-Saharan Africa. When testing heterogeneous effects for the degree of commodity appropriability, historical African-specific factors, and quality of institutions, I find that easily taxed crops behave differently to an increase in international crop prices. In the same vein, I find that neither historical African-specific factors nor the quality of institutions seem to induce differential responses in conflicts to commodity price shocks.
Schlagwörter: 
Natural Resources
Conflicts
Commodity Shocks
JEL: 
O13
Q32
Q34
D74
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
859.13 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.