Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/267732 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2022
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Arbeitspapier No. 05/2022
Verlag: 
Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Wiesbaden
Zusammenfassung: 
While vintage differentiation is a highly prominent feature of various regulations, it can induce significant biases. We study these biases in the context of New Source Review-a program within the US Clean Air Act imposing costly sulfur dioxide (SO2) abatement requirements on new boilers but not existing ones. In particular, we empirically investigate how the differential treatment of coal boil- ers shaped the generation landscape by affecting unit utilization, retirement, and emissions. Leveraging a novel dataset covering state-level sulfur dioxide regula- tions for power plants, we show that the differentiation continued to have a strong effect even 30 years after its passage, raising the probability of surviving another year by 1.5 percentage points for grandfathered boilers and increasing their op- erations by around 800 hours annually. We estimate exempted units would have emitted a third fewer emissions per year, had they been subject to NSR. We run back-of-the-envelope calculations to assess the societal damages associated with the delayed retirements, higher utilization and higher emission rates of the grand- fathered boilers. Focusing solely on the additional SO2 emissions, we estimate annual costs of up to $ 65 billion associated with the vintage differentiation in New Source Review.
Schlagwörter: 
grandfathering
regulation design
Clean Air Act
power plants
coal
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.04 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.