Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/272034 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 10390
Publisher: 
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich
Abstract: 
The incorporation of increasing returns and imperfect competition into applied general-equilibrium (AGE) models, beginning with Harris (1984), led to much larger welfare effects from changes such as trade liberalization. But the imperfect competition side of these IO developments has often failed to incorporate meaningful strategic behavior, largely ruling out firm-level productivity and scale effects. I show here that the incorporation of theory-based endogenous markups into AGE models is not difficult in spite of the added simultaneity of the system. I first derive the optimal markup equations for Nash Cournot and Nash Bertrand competition in a CES environment with free entry and exit. Then I code a simple numerical model using non-linear complementarity. Three alternatives are considered: large-group monopolistic competition (LGMC), small-group Cournot (SGC) and small-group Bertrand (SGB). Growth in the economy is the experiment used to compare these specifications. While the overall effects of growth on welfare are qualitatively similar, the gains to initially small economies are much larger under either small-group assumption relative to LGMC, but diminish relative to LGMC as economies grow large. Secondly I show how the contributions of variety (entry), firm scale (productivity), and markups (distortions) to welfare changes differ substantially among the three alternatives.
JEL: 
F12
D58
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.