Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/283492 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics No. 27-2023
Publisher: 
Philipps-University Marburg, School of Business and Economics, Marburg
Abstract: 
Does budget transparency effectively limit the use of creative accounting to circumvent fiscal rules? Through examining a Spanish reform that limited the obligation to provide regular budget information, I study the effect of relaxing transparency rules on budget forecast errors. After the reform, municipalities with less than 5,000 inhabitants were not obligated to provide quarterly information on cumulative budget execution and forecast deviations. Using a difference-in-differences estimator in a sample of municipalities from this Madrid region between 2010-2019, I compare expenditure and revenue forecast errors between municipalities below 5,000 inhabitants (treatment group) and above 5,000 inhabitants (control group). I observe that reducing the frequency of budget reporting leads to a systematic underestimation of planned expenditures and revenues. Furthermore, most differences are found in pre- and electoral periods, indicating a political forecast cycle. I then combine the introduction of a gender quota with the transparency reform to study gender differences in budget forecast errors, finding that female politicians systematically deviate from initial expenditure projections for electoral purposes.
Subjects: 
Budget transparency
Fiscal rules
Difference-in-differences
Political forecast cycles
Gender
Spanish municipalities
Madrid region
JEL: 
C23
E62
D72
H68
J16
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.