Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/283736 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
WIDER Working Paper No. 2023/40
Publisher: 
The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki
Abstract: 
The aid effectiveness principles have limits if the recipient is fragile. The problem of relevance exists if the recipient has an authoritarian or totalitarian regime. In situations of weak statehood and fragility, a large portion of aid would likely bypass the state because of high demand for service delivery, weak state capacity and because the principles exclude military assistance. If a regime lacks national and international legitimacy and violates citizens' fundamental rights and international norms, aligning aid to the objectives of such a regime may be counterproductive. However, the termination of aid will hurt people who already suffer. This paper argues that it is imperative to redefine the aim of aid and adopt a more flexible set of principles. Evidence for this is provided by examining the interactions between donors and recipients looking at the case of Afghanistan during two periods: democratic regime 2002-2021, totalitarian regime 2021 onward.
Subjects: 
aid effectiveness
state fragility
regime type
citizens' rights
international norms
Afghanistan
JEL: 
F3
I3
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-92-9267-348-2
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
341.88 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.