Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/286400 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2023
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
EWI Working Paper No. 23/07
Verlag: 
Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (EWI), Cologne
Zusammenfassung: 
As redispatch costs and their associated distributional impacts continue to rise, the discussion on reconfiguring bidding zones in European power markets persists. However, determining an appropriate bidding zone configuration is a non-trivial task, as it must prove beneficial under varying weather conditions, load situations, and an uncertain future, essentially necessitating persistent benefits. This paper uses the German-Luxembourg market area as an example to investigate the impact of uncertain factors, such as short-term weather patterns and long-term system changes, on the potential reduction of redispatch costs resulting from a two-zone split. Employing hierarchical clustering on hourly time series of Locational Marginal Prices for multiple historical weather and future scenario years, the paper derives bidding zone splits and assesses their robustness regarding redispatch cost reduction. Sensitivities to uncertain factors such as grid and renewable expansion, demand development, and fuel prices are investigated. The results indicate that a north-south split of the German-Luxembourg market area can robustly reduce redispatch costs. The impact on the reduction potential of yearly weather fluctuations is limited, owing to the structural nature of grid bottlenecks. However, the long-term transformations within the power system, coupled with their associated uncertainties, can significantly diminish the potential for cost reduction through a bidding zone split.
Schlagwörter: 
Market Design
Bidding Zone Review
Electricity Markets
Nodal Pricing
Energy System Modeling
Renewable Energies
JEL: 
D47
C61
Q40
Q48
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
5.3 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.