Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/60680 
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
Staff Report No. 161
Publisher: 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York, NY
Abstract: 
This paper evaluates current strategies for the empirical modeling of forecast behavior. In particular, we focus on the reliability of using proxies from time series models of heteroskedasticity to describe changes in predictive confidence. We address this issue by examining the relationship between ex post forecast errors and ex ante measures of forecast uncertainty from data on inflation forecasts from the Survey of Professional Forecasters. The results provide little evidence of a strong link between observed heteroskedasticity in the consensus forecast errors and forecast uncertainty. Instead, the findings indicate a significant link between observed heteroskedasticity in the consensus forecast errors and forecast dispersion. We conclude that conventional model-based measures of uncertainty may be capturing not the degree of confidence that individuals attach to their forecasts but rather the degree of disagreement across individuals in their forecasts.
JEL: 
C12
C22
E37
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
558.71 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.