Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/82845 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
1998
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Working Paper No. 1998:6
Verlag: 
Uppsala University, Department of Economics, Uppsala
Zusammenfassung: 
Many comparisons of the performance of public and private producers use a public/private ownership dummy variable to capture cost differences in cross section data. This is appropriate if the producer choice is random. The dummy variable model is, however, logically inconsistent if the producer choice depends on cost differences. If cost differences do not matter for choice, there is still a risk for selectivity bias if there are other variables affecting the producer choice. I compare public and private enterprises using refuse collection costs in 115 Swedish municipalities. The data cover 170 enterprises. First, I find that cost differences do not affect producer choice. Second, producer choice is important for costs. Third, the cost advantage found for private firms using the dummy variable model disappears when choice is taken into account. Fourth, the parameters of the cost functions differ between private and public firms.
Schlagwörter: 
public ownership
private ownership
competitive tendering
contracting out
cost minimization
switching regression model with endogenous switching
privatization
JEL: 
D24
E22
L32
L33
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
190.29 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.