Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/127259 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2007
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper Series No. 444
Verlag: 
University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics, Heidelberg
Zusammenfassung: 
We study the impact of ambiguity on two alternative institutions of financial intermediation in an economy where consumers face uncertain liquidity needs. The ambiguity the consumers experience is modeled by the degree of confidence in their additive beliefs. We analyze the optimal liquidity allocation and two institutional settings for implementing this allocation: a secondary asset market and a bank deposit contract. For full confidence we obtain the well-known result that consumers prefer the bank deposit contract over the asset market, since the former can provide the optimal cross subsidy for consumers with high liquidity needs. With increasing ambiguity this preference will be reversed: the asset market is preferred, since it avoids inefficient liquidation if the bank reserve holdings turn out to be suboptimal.
Schlagwörter: 
Financial institutions
Liquidity
Ambiguity
Choquet Expected Utility
JEL: 
D8
G1
G2
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
398.52 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.