Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/182470 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2016
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process [ISSN:] 1936-6744 [Volume:] 8 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Creative Decisions Foundation [Place:] Pittsburgh [Year:] 2016 [Pages:] 442-461
Verlag: 
Creative Decisions Foundation, Pittsburgh
Zusammenfassung: 
To improve a firm’s supply chain performance, it is essential to have a vendor evaluation process to be able to showcase an organization’s success in the present aggressive market. Hence, the process of evaluating the vendor is a crucial task of the purchasing executives in supply chain management. The objective of this research is to propose a methodology to evaluate the vendors for a steel pipe manufacturing firm in Gujarat, India. For the purpose of the study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process was used to evaluate the best raw material vendor for this company. Multiple qualitative and quantitative criteria are involved in the vendor evaluation process. To solve the complex problem of vendor evaluation, a trade-off between these multi-criteria is important. The outcomes indicated that the AHP technique makes it simpler to assign weights for the different criteria for evaluating the vendor. Research findings showed that quality is the most important criterion followed by delivery, cost and vendor relationship management.
Schlagwörter: 
Cost
Delivery
Quality
Vendor evaluation
Vendor relationship management
JEL: 
C44
M11
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version
Erscheint in der Sammlung:

Datei(en):





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.