Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/192311 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2002
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Papers No. 329
Verlag: 
Statistics Norway, Research Department, Oslo
Zusammenfassung: 
The Duhem-Quine thesis asserts that any empirical evaluation of a theory is in fact a composite test of several interconnected hypotheses. Recalcitrant evidence signals falsity within the conjunction of hypotheses, but logic alone cannot pinpoint the individual element(s) inside the theoretical cluster responsible for a false prediction. This paper considers the relevance of the Duhem-Quine thesis for experimental economics. A starting point is to detail how laboratory evaluations of economic hypotheses constitute composite tests. Another aim is to scrutinize the strategy of conducting a series of experiments in order to hem in the source(s) of disconfirmative evidence. A Bayesian approach is employed to argue that reproducing experiments is not necessarily useful in terms of identifying correct causes of recalcitrant data.
Schlagwörter: 
Experimental economics
methodology
Duhem-Quine thesis.
JEL: 
B41
C90
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
341.4 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.