Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/209753 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Citation: 
[Journal:] West European Politics [ISSN:] 1743-9655 [Volume:] 43 [Issue:] 7 [Publisher:] Taylor & Francis [Place:] London [Year:] 2020 [Pages:] 1365-1387
Publisher: 
Taylor & Francis, London
Abstract: 
Challenger parties’ electoral successes have attracted increasing scholarly attention. Based on the example of West European radical left parties, this article investigates whether and how centripetal and centrifugal positional movements on different conflict dimensions influence the election results of these parties. Depending on parties’ issue-linkages, these strategies will have a different effect for the economic and the non-economic issue dimension. Due to radical left parties’ long-term commitment and a strong party-issue linkage on economic issues, more moderate positions will play to their electoral advantage. In contrast, far-left parties compete with social democratic and green-libertarian parties for party-issue linkages on the non-economic issue dimension. Here, they benefit from promoting centrifugal strategies. Based on time-series cross-section analyses for 25 West European far-left parties between 1990 and 2017, the empirical results show that the success of radical left parties’ positional strategies varies with the conflict dimension in question and that this effect is only partly moderated by the positions of competing mainstream left parties.
Subjects: 
radical left parties
party competition
electoral behaviour
elections
political parties
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.