Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/212216 
Year of Publication: 
2012
Series/Report no.: 
Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers No. 13/2012
Publisher: 
Bank of Finland, Helsinki
Abstract: 
This study proposes an information asymmetry hypothesis to examine why bank credit ratings vary among countries even when bank financial ratios remain constant. Countries are divided among those with low and high information asymmetry. The former include high-income countries, those in North America and West Europe regions, and those with strong institutional environment quality, whereas the latter group possess the opposite characteristics. This study hypothesizes that the influences of financial ratios on ratings are enhanced in low information asymmetry countries but reduced in countries with high information asymmetry. The sample includes the long-term credit ratings issued by Standard and Poor's from 86 countries during 2002-2008. The estimated results show that the effects of financial ratios on ratings are significantly affected by information asymmetries. Countries wishing to improve the credit ratings of their banks thus should reduce information asymmetry.
Subjects: 
Bank rating
Financial ratio
Information asymmetry
Institutional quality
JEL: 
G21
G32
G38
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-952-462-798-6
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.