Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/214355 
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
CREMA Working Paper No. 2006-09
Publisher: 
Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel
Abstract: 
Recently, the problems associated with the existing journal review process aroused discussions from seasoned management researchers, who have also made useful suggestions for improving the process. To complement these suggestions, we propose a more radical change: a manuscript should be reviewed on an "as is" basis and its fate be determined in one round of review. The as-is review process shortens the time period from submission to final acceptance, reduces the workload of editors, referees and authors, provides frank author feedback to referees, and, most important, lets authors own all of the ideas in their publications.
Subjects: 
Journals
reviews
authors
submissions
JEL: 
Z0
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
200.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.