Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/218035 
Year of Publication: 
1989
Citation: 
[Journal:] South African Journal of Business Management [ISSN:] 2078-5976 [Volume:] 20 [Issue:] 4 [Publisher:] African Online Scientific Information Systems (AOSIS) [Place:] Cape Town [Year:] 1989 [Pages:] 178-183
Publisher: 
African Online Scientific Information Systems (AOSIS), Cape Town
Abstract (Translated): 
In the literature on forecasting, consensus has been reached about improved forecasting accuracy brought about by the combination of two or more forecasts for a given variable. No consensus, however, exists about the exact way in which the various forecasts in the combination should be weighed. The evidence points towards simple weighing schemes. The present study utilizes South African macro-economic forecasts published by seven forecasters on eight variables to evaluate the benefits to be gained from combining forecasts and to evaluate the relative accuracy of a number of combination schemes. The results confirm the current views on the combination of forecasts in so far as combining forecasts have led to increased accuracy in forecasting. It further confirms the viewpoint that a simple or weighted arithmetic average of individual forecasts seems to be acceptable as instruments for combining forecasts.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.