Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/223733 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 13291
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Evidence of grade inflation in U.S. high schools is often misinterpreted due to confusion about how grade inflation is, or should be, defined. This note clarifies the implications of recent research on grade inflation in two ways. First, we situate the evidence by defining three distinct types of grade inflation. Second, we extend past research using data from North Carolina by documenting the different types of grade inflation experienced by high school students in the state over a recent ten-year period. Static grade inflation has been, and remains, higher in schools serving relatively disadvantaged student populations; however, differential growth in grade inflation in schools serving relatively advantaged student populations over the past 10 years has significantly narrowed this SES-based gap in grade inflation.
Subjects: 
grade inflation
achievement gaps
grading standards
JEL: 
I26
Q54
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
290.61 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.