Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/240238 
Year of Publication: 
2019
Citation: 
[Journal:] Agricultural and Food Economics [ISSN:] 2193-7532 [Volume:] 7 [Issue:] 1 [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Year:] 2019 [Pages:] 1-21
Publisher: 
Springer, Heidelberg
Abstract: 
This paper examines the intra-gender nutrition outcome both with and without the presence of household level shock using Living Standards Measurement Study-Integrated Survey (LSMS) panel data in Ethiopia. We used a mixed-effect estimation strategy to analyze how parents' gender preference affects resource allocation between boys and girls, and nutrition outcomes. We used a gender dummy and found that child gender dummy interaction with household level shock index variables does not have a significant effect on child nutrition. The results indicate that nutrition equality could be due to (1) the girls' biological bodily development that causes differences in trouble tolerance such that the girls' nutrition remains the same as that of boys and (2) the boys' physical exercises which cause weight loss such that it brings their nutrition down making it equal to that of the girls'. The results suggest the need for energy food supplementation for boys and a need for equal care for both girls and boys.
Subjects: 
Nutrition bias
Gender preference
Mixed-effects model
Resources
Shock index
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.