Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/240948 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Health Economics [ISSN:] 1099-1050 [Volume:] 30 [Issue:] 9 [Publisher:] Wiley [Place:] Hoboken, NJ [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 2307-2311
Verlag: 
Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Zusammenfassung: 
In health economics, the distinction between welfarism and extra-welfarism has been employed to discuss various epistemological and normative differences between health evaluation approaches. However, a clear consensus on the definition of either welfarism, extra-welfarism, or the differences between the two sets of approaches has not emerged. I propose an alternative set of distinctions that allows for a more fine-grained categorization of health evaluation approaches. This categorization focuses on five dimensions: (1) the maximand of an evaluation approach, (2) its sensitivity toward normative concerns that defy compensation, (3) its position on which groups of individuals or collective entities act as sources of values, (4) its sensitivity to changes of mind, and (5) the inclusion of process-external values.
Schlagwörter: 
deliberative democracy
ethics
philosophy of health economics
political philosophy
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
299.09 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.