Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/246231 
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
UNRISD Working Paper No. 2019-6
Publisher: 
United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Geneva
Abstract: 
Arguably the most important step in the measurement and reporting of an organization's performance is completion of a materiality determination beforehand. At base, materiality determinations address the all-important question of what the scope and criteria for analysis must be in each case, recognizing that in principle no two organizations are alike. Materiality determinations therefore address the question of what the organization specific standards of performance should be - whether social, economic or environmental - and what the corresponding metrics or indicators, too, should be in order to fully assess performance. Even in cases where purportedly universal indicators are being used, the very choice of which ones to in fact use presupposes their relevance. In this paper, we present and advocate for a specific approach for how best to make materiality determinations that are, in the parlance of sustainability management, context-based. As such, the method proposed is normative and triple bottom line in scope, in that it holds organizations accountable for their impacts on all vital capitals and with the well-being of all stakeholders in mind.
Subjects: 
Context-based sustainability
Impact valuation
Integrated reporting
Materiality
Performance accounting
Rightsholders
Stakeholders
Sustainability accounting
Triplebottom line
Vital capitals
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
549.63 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.