Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/246341 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2018
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Operations Research Perspectives [ISSN:] 2214-7160 [Volume:] 5 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2018 [Pages:] 82-93
Verlag: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Zusammenfassung: 
Ergonomic design of a product considers design, cognitive and behavioral information during the design stage with a view to improve the comfort level of the user and aesthetic look of the product. However, a large number of products are available in the market place possessing a wide range of features to address the ergonomic considerations. Many times, the features may be redundant and hardly enhance interaction between the user and the product leading to user dissatisfaction. But few important features focusing its functionality and physical comfort can possibly address the usability of product and improve satisfaction level of the user. This paper proposes a fuzzy multi-attribute decision making (MADM) approach integrating both subjective and objective weights for each criterion so that superior ergonomically designed product can be evaluated. The methodology is explained with the help of an example of selection of an office chair. Three popular approaches have been considered to compare the ranking of alternatives.
Schlagwörter: 
Multi-attribute decision making (MADM)
TOPSIS (Techniques for Order Preference by Similarity to Identical Solution)
VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenjea)
PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations)
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
921.85 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.