Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/247147 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
EHES Working Paper No. 217
Verlag: 
European Historical Economics Society (EHES), s.l.
Zusammenfassung: 
Broadberry, Guan and Li (2018) made estimates for China's GDP per capita from 980 to 1840 in order to date the onset of the Great Divergence between China and western European economies. In response to Solar's (2021) criticisms, they (2021) made some revisions to the estimates but largely dismissed most of Solar's concerns, particularly those about their series for China's population and its implications for dating the Great Divergence. This working paper assesses their revisions, reaffirms concerns about the level of their 1840 benchmark, and points out the weaknesses of the population figures in greater detail. The dating of the Great Divergence turns out to depend on the population series used and on the interpretation of what was happening to incomes in China during the mid-seventeenth century. This paper recommends considerable skepticism about Broadberry, Guan and Li's estimates.
Schlagwörter: 
China
Great Divergence
historical national accounts
population
JEL: 
E1
N15
O47
O53
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
379.44 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.