Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/263865 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] CESifo Forum [ISSN:] 2190-717X [Volume:] 23 [Issue:] 04 [Publisher:] ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München [Place:] München [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 49-56
Publisher: 
ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München
Abstract: 
The US, one of the oldest democracies in the world, needs to face deficiencies in its electoral system. The first one has to do with the so-called 'Electoral College.' Ruled by the majority principle, it may lead to almost paradoxical results: a candidate may win far less than 50 percent of the popular vote share and yet be elected as US President. The second one is located in the 'geography' of the elections for the House of Representatives, organized in the federal states. Surprisingly, the likelihood for winning a district is, to a large extent, dependent on its geographical design and allocation. Thereby, it is possible for even minority parties to take advantage and win the majority of representatives ('gerrymandering'). We discuss both of these problematic aspects of the US electoral system and put forward some alternatives to improve the situation from a political economy point of view.
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.