Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/272455 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 15828
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Using data drawn from 2010, 2012, and 2013 American Time Use Survey Well-Being Modules, this paper examines the existence of son preference among fathers in the U.S. by estimating the effect of child gender on the fathers' subjective well-being. A wide range of subjective well-being measures, including happiness, pain, sadness, stress, tiredness, and meaningfulness, is analyzed, and fixed-effects models are adopted to control for unobserved individual heterogeneity. The results from the full sample show that fathers feel less sad and tired when interacting with both sons and daughters versus with daughters only. In families with only one child, fathers report no difference in subjective well-being when spending time with a son versus with a daughter. By further stratifying this sample of fathers by child's age of three, we continue to find no difference in paternal subjective well-being between being with a son and with a daughter when the child is younger than three. However, when the child is three or older, we find that fathers feel less stressed and more meaningful being with a son versus with a daughter. The results from Asian fathers in the U.S., in contrast, show a tremendous reduction in stress in activities with sons only than with daughters only. These results indicate no evidence of son preference in the general U.S. population. If there is any, it only exists among Asian fathers in the U.S.
Subjects: 
subjective well-being
child gender
son preference
stress
time use
JEL: 
J13
J16
I31
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
569.42 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.