Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/277559 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2022
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention (EJEEP) [ISSN:] 2052-7772 [Volume:] 19 [Issue:] 3 [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 397-414
Verlag: 
Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper investigates whether post-Keynesian economics is well-equipped to address the ecological crisis we face today. The major crisis of our times has three interrelated dimensions: ecological overshoot, socio-economic inequality and a growth imperative built into the economic system. We argue that the main building blocks of post-Keynesian thought – in contrast to neoclassical approaches – are well-placed for addressing the ecological crisis if reconfigured accordingly, and that such a development will likely be very fruitful. Yet, we identify the growth effects of reducing inequality, the capitalist growth imperative and political power from wealth concentration and incumbent industries as the main contradictions between post-Keynesian theory and fossil phase-out. While the first of these may be overcome with adequate industrial and regulatory policy, the second would require a fundamental transformation. This, in turn, is impeded by the third. We argue that more attention should be paid to resolving the residual contradictions and indicate advances in the broader Political Economy and Ecological Economics literature that may serve as a starting point, in particular focusing on human needs.
Schlagwörter: 
post-Keynesian economics
ecological economics
crisis
inequality
ecology
growthE12
Q52
B51
D31
D21
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.