Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/280066 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Citation: 
[Journal:] Wirtschaftsdienst [ISSN:] 1613-978X [Volume:] 103 [Issue:] 10 [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 716-718
Publisher: 
Sciendo, Warsaw
Abstract (Translated): 
This article asks what lessons can be learned from the introduction of the 35-hour week for the current debate in the steelindustry. In retrospect, it can be shown that a compromise in collective bargaining policy cleared the way from the 40- to the 35-hourweek. A package of shorter and more flexible working hours could also make the 32-hour week possible in the steel industry in a simi-larly cost- and distribution-neutral way, especially as large sections of the workforce there already work less than 35 hours.
Subjects: 
Arbeitszeitgestaltung
Deutschland
JEL: 
J22
J52
J81
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.