Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/280693 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2023
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
I4R Discussion Paper Series No. 96
Verlag: 
Institute for Replication (I4R), s.l.
Zusammenfassung: 
Listo, Saberian and Thivierge (2023) conduct a careful replication of De Haas and Popov (2023) using the data, code, and instructions we made available at the time of publication. They highlight an inconsistency between the table notes and the main text in how the clustering of standard errors is described; uncover a coding mistake in the GMM regressions; and show that weak instruments are unlikely to bias our 2SLS coefficients. In this reply, we show that our results remain economically meaningful and statistically precise (though smaller in magnitude) when we (i) cluster standard errors by country in the country panel; (ii) correct the GMM code; and (iii) include or exclude China in the country and industry samples.
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.03 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.