Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/280889 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2022-16
Publisher: 
Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Quezon City
Abstract: 
The recent calls for the revival of the Oil Price Stabilization Fund (OPSF) are tantamount to a call for a policy reversal, that is, reversal of the downstream oil industry deregulation that began in 1998. The history of the OPSF presents important lessons for policymakers. Petroleum price setting by fiat and using a price stabilization fund to smooth the price resulted in mismatches between payments to the fund and claims against it. The general public then ended up subsidizing oil consumers through subsidies from the national budget. When faced with political pressures, policymakers also lacked discipline in sticking to the price stabilization purpose of the OPSF, such as failing to implement the increase in the regulated price when the magnitude was large and allowing the use of the fund for something not directly related to price stabilization. Settling the legal challenges to OPSF credits and payments with finality also took time. Price distortion also resulted in cross-subsidization that created mismatches between demand and environmental objectives. Although there remain a few countries that have price stabilization funds, all of them are finding it hard to sustain funds operation and dealing with large deficits. Besides, the general direction of reforms globally is to remove fossil fuel subsidies. [...]
Subjects: 
Oil Price Stabilization Fund
oil price regulation
downstream oil industry deregulation
policy reversal
oil crisis
targeted assistance
fossil fuel subsidies
price unbundling
oil stockpiling
strategic oil reserves
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.