Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282102 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2023
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper No. 410
Verlag: 
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin
Zusammenfassung: 
How do men and women differ in their persistence after experiencing failure in a competitive environment? We tackle this question by combining a large online experiment (N=2,086) with machine learning. We find that when losing is unequivocally due to merit, both men and women exhibit a significant decrease in subsequent tournament entry. However, when the prior tournament is unfair, i.e., a loss is no longer necessarily based on merit, women are more discouraged than men. These results suggest that transparent meritocratic criteria may play a key role in preventing women from falling behind after experiencing a loss.
Schlagwörter: 
competitiveness
gender
fairness
machine learning
online experiment
JEL: 
C90
D91
J16
C14
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
3.12 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.