Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282286 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Atlantic Review of Economics (ARoEc) [ISSN:] 2174-3835 [Volume:] 4 [Issue:] 1 [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 1-24
Verlag: 
Colegio de Economistas de A Coruña, A Coruña
Zusammenfassung: 
This work makes a comparative analysis of the evaluation of an investment project, considering two approaches, one with cash flows at constant prices and the other at current prices. The goal is to determine which of these two approaches is best for project evaluation to make the right investment decision. At present, both positions remain, as some authors recommend that the best approach to evaluate investment projects is to use cash flows at current prices, while others prefer the constant prices approach. The study presented here performs an analysis of the growth of these flows considering an increase in real production in both approaches at constant and current prices, and the project is evaluated using two methods: NPV and IRR. With the results obtained, a discussion is carried out where it is shown that the main conclusion is that the constant prices approach is better for evaluating investment projects and determining their viability without incurring additional risks to the project.
Schlagwörter: 
Investment Projects
Evaluation of Investment Projects
Cash Flows
JEL: 
E31
G24
G31
G32
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.13 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.