Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/28236
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Groth, Markus | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-02-17 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-10-01T15:02:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-01T15:02:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/28236 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Managed grasslands contribute in a number of ways to the biodiversity of European agricultural landscapes and provide a wide range of ecosystem services that are also of socio-economic value. Against the background of a rapid biodiversity loss in agricultural landscapes, increasing attention is being paid to farming practices that enhance ecosystem services. Therefore developing cost-effective conservation payment schemes is the main challenge facing present European agri-environmental policy. This paper deals with the transferability of a payment scheme that combines a payment-by-results approach with the use of discriminatory-price conservation procurement auctions in order to improve the cost-effectiveness of conservation schemes for grassland plant biodiversity. Hence the design, implementation and results of the adapted case-study payment scheme in the county Steinburg in the northernmost federal state of Germany (Schleswig-Holstein) will be focussed. Results concerning the ecological-effectiveness of the payment-by-results approach as well bid-prices and potential cost-effectiveness gains by the use of conservation procurement auctions point out that it was possible to transfer the payment scheme successfully to another region, whereby the adapted case-study even. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aLeuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre |cLüneburg | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aWorking Paper Series in Economics |x119 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C93 | en |
dc.subject.jel | D44 | en |
dc.subject.jel | H41 | en |
dc.subject.jel | Q24 | en |
dc.subject.jel | Q28 | en |
dc.subject.jel | Q57 | en |
dc.subject.jel | R52 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Agri-environmental policy | en |
dc.subject.keyword | discriminatory-price auction | en |
dc.subject.keyword | ecological services | en |
dc.subject.keyword | experimental economics | en |
dc.subject.keyword | multi-unit auction | en |
dc.subject.keyword | payment-by-results | en |
dc.subject.keyword | plant biodiversity | en |
dc.subject.keyword | rural development | en |
dc.subject.keyword | outperforms the original case-study | en |
dc.title | The transferability and performance of payment-by-results biodiversity conservation procurement auctions: empirical evidence from northernmost Germany | - |
dc.type | |aWorking Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 59190036X | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.