Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282687 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 16560
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Many applicants want a job with the possibility of telework. However, the literature is unclear on whether being explicit about this wish and the reason for it leads to negative consequences on hiring intentions. In this paper we therefore investigate how expressing a desire for telework, for work-life balance and for productivity in particular, impacts the probability of receiving an interview and what it signals to recruiters. To this end, we set up a state-of-the-art vignette experiment in which recruiters evaluate fictitious applicants for different jobs. As a result of this experimental set-up, the answers to our research questions can be interpreted causally, and external validity benefits from the heterogeneity of the jobs. We find that if the desire for work-life balance is the stated motivation, the preference is punished more severely than if the motivation is productivity. Compared to applicants who do not mention a preference for telework, recruiters are 5.1 percentage points less inclined to invite applicants who pronounce this desire for work-life balance to an interview and 2.1 percentage points less inclined to invite applicants for whom the motivation is productivity. Lastly, mentioning a telework preference for work-life balance has a clear negative effect on anticipated achievement striving, commitment, and availability.
Subjects: 
telework
interview probability
factorial survey experiment
JEL: 
M51
M54
J22
J32
J63
J81
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
686.12 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.