Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/283862 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
LIS Working Paper Series No. 855
Publisher: 
Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), Luxembourg
Abstract: 
Although work-family scholars generally agree that maternal and parental leave policies affect women's labor force outcomes, the direction and extent of this effect is highly contentious. Complicating the debate, parental leave policies are measured in a variety of ways in crossnational research, making it difficult to compare findings across studies. There is little assessment of how measurement affects outcomes or of alternate ways to measure these leave schemes. Using data from the Luxembourg Income Study (~2013) and an original collection of parental leave measures from 26 countries, this paper analyzes how different measurement strategies affect women's employment rates by examining combinations of paid and unpaid maternal and parental leave, wage replacement rates, job protection, and eligibility requirements. The results suggest that competing findings in previous work may be explained by scholars' focus on different pieces of maternal and parental leave policy, shedding new light on the importance of using comparable indicators. I argue for the use of reliable ways to measure policy, such as the importance of including wage replacement rates in future models for more consistent, complete perspectives of policy effect.
Subjects: 
family policy
measuerment
labor market outcomes
employment
women
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
429.64 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.