Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/284647 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2023-48
Publisher: 
Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Quezon City
Abstract: 
In the literature on Philippine public procurement, knowledge gaps exist in terms of coverage of period of reform implementation and scope of reform application. This study helps close these gaps by analyzing Philippine public procurement history up to the years of application of the 2016 implementing rules and regulations of the General Procurement Act (GPRA) and using data for the usual three categories of procurement, namely, civil works, consulting services, and goods procurement. It also suggests a logit model of procurement specifically for the Philippines given the available data in the Philippine Government Electronic Procurement System (PhilGEPS). The study finds that persistent issues include delays in procurement, non-conformance with procedures, poor bid design and evaluation, weak capacity to implement procurement procedures, and corruption. It also describes new challenges that have emerged, such as the use of digital payments and the promotion of innovations. Running the logit model using PhilGEPS data, the study finds a general tendency toward weaker competition despite the 2016 reforms. The study then offers recommendations to improve the PhilGEPS, minimize corruption, improve procurement capacity, and address the emerging challenges. It also recommends future areas of research, namely, procurement policies outside the GPRA, bid rigging, red flags of corruption, and procurement of scientific, scholarly, or artistic work.
Subjects: 
procurement
public procurement
logit model
logistic regression
corruption
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.