Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/286614 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2019
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] CES Working Papers [ISSN:] 2067-7693 [Volume:] 11 [Issue:] 3 [Year:] 2019 [Pages:] 259-268
Verlag: 
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Centre for European Studies, Iasi
Zusammenfassung: 
The paper starts with an introduction of previous European instruments concerning cooperation in criminal matters, moving towards the presentation of European Investigation Order as regulated by the 2014/41/EU Directive. It then analysis the implementation of this instrument in Romania by Law 302/2004 on international judicial cooperation in criminal matters using a comparative method with reference to Austria, Latvia and Sweden. The paper gives some examples from Romanian jurisprudence involving European Investigation Orders. In the end, after presenting some of the disadvantages that may arise from executing an European Investigation Order, such as the costs that may burden the executing state, the paper ends in an optimistic tone concluding that the EIO seems to be a very useful tool for practitioners as it sets time limits and permits direct transmission of requests being faster and easier to execute.
Schlagwörter: 
European Investigation Order
cooperation in criminal matters
Romania
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
250.3 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.