Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/295805 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 16782
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
We investigate the impact of a change in the gender composition of the pool of candidates on the academic performance of women in an entrance exam. We use data from a natural experiment that altered the gender composition of the candidates for a nation-wide admission exam to a coding educational program. Our identification strategy exploits the fact that both men and women were accepted for the admission exam in all years except for 2019, when only women were allowed to take it. Our results reveal that in the absence of men, women exhibit enhanced performance, particularly in subjects where men do traditionally better, such as mathematics and logical reasoning. Conversely, we observe no significant effects in verbal tasks, where men do not typically outperform. The improvement in performance stems from both increased attempts at questions and a higher rate of correct answers. Women improve their academic performance by exerting greater effort when men are not present. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the stereotype threat is deactivated in the absence of men, highlighting the nuanced impact of gender composition on women's performance in high-stakes exams.
Subjects: 
gender
performance
effort
stereotype threat
competition
JEL: 
I20
I24
J16
J24
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
734.97 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.