Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/296175 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo Working Paper No. 11086
Publisher: 
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich
Abstract: 
Evaluating the desirability of a reform typically involves weighing the gains of the winners against the losses of the losers using welfare weights. Welfare weights measure the value that citizens assigns to a $1 gain in consumption to individuals. They can capture various normative ideals like utilitarianism and equality of opportunity. What are the welfare weights that citizens assign to individuals in society? We develop a portable method to elicit welfare weights from general population samples and validate it using two experiments. We find that the general population weights are more progressive than the weights implied by tax and transfer policies in the U.S., indicating that the general population desires additional redistribution. The general population weights are less progressive than those frequently used in the literature. We explore the implications of these weights for optimal income taxes.
Subjects: 
welfare weights
policy views
income taxation
JEL: 
C93
D31
H23
I31
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.