Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/298717 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] IZA Journal of Development and Migration [ISSN:] 2520-1786 [Volume:] 13 [Issue:] 1 [Article No.:] 8 [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 1-19
Publisher: 
Sciendo, Warsaw
Abstract: 
We examine households' temporary international migration response when faced with shocks in rural Kyrgyzstan. Using a household fixed effects model, we find that while a drought shock increases migration, a winter shock reduces migration. We argue that this difference is because of the trade-off between two effects of a shock for a household: loss of income and increase in the need for labor services. Migration increases when the former effect of a shock dominates and it reduces when the latter effect dominates. We explore these mechanisms further, and find that when households have easier access to informal finance the migration response is muted only for shocks for which the adverse income effect dominates. These findings provide evidence in favor of our proposed mechanisms through which shocks affect migration.
Subjects: 
temporary migration
shocks
insurance
informal finance
Asia
Kyrgyzstan
JEL: 
J61
O15
O16
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.